MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
03563ntm a2200325 i 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER |
|---|
| control field |
12102116 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20231203094047.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
150118s2023 ua a f bm 000 0 eng | |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Original cataloging agency |
EG-NcFUE |
| Transcribing agency |
EG-NcFUE |
| Description conventions |
rda |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE |
|---|
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title |
eng |
| Language code of summary or abstract/overprinted title or subtitle |
ara |
| 082 04 - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER |
|---|
| Classification number |
617.643 |
| Item number |
H.K.C |
| Edition number |
22 |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Hammam, Karim Ibrahim El-Sayed |
| Relator term |
author |
| 9 (RLIN) |
34037 |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Comparing program compatibility for dental operators between different in-office clear aligners softwares / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc |
Karim Ibrahim EL-Sayed Hammam (BDS 2014 MIU University), Supervisors Dr. Essam Mohamed Nassef Selim, Professor of orthodontics, Future University in Egypt, Dr. Mostafa Mohamed EL-Dawlatly, Associate professor of orthodontics, Cairo University |
| 246 15 - VARYING FORM OF TITLE |
|---|
| Title proper/short title |
مقارنة توافق بين عدة برامج حاسوبية مختلفة للتقويم الشفاف في العيادات لاطباء الأسنان |
| 264 #1 - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc |
2023 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
72 pages, 2 pages : |
| Other physical details |
color illustrations; |
| Dimensions |
24 cm |
| 336 ## - CONTENT TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rdacontent |
| Content type term |
text |
| 337 ## - MEDIA TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rdamedia |
| Media type term |
unmediated |
| 338 ## - CARRIER TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rdacarrier |
| Carrier type term |
volume |
| 502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE |
|---|
| Dissertation note |
Thesis (M.Sc.)-Future University in Egypt, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics Department, 2023 |
| 504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE |
|---|
| Bibliography, etc |
Includes bibliographical references. |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
The aim of the present study was to: Compare program compatibility for dental operators between different in office clear aligners softwares: (3D Maestro,3Shape, BlueSky bio, Plainmeca) Comparison and evaluation will be done by users using simple scoring templates after using the 4 softwares. Four different orthodontic planning softwares used for planning clear aligners cases were used in this study. After working on the fabrication process of the aligner on the software the clinician was given a scoring template for evaluation Ten orthodontists were recruited for the evaluation process A total of 48 casts were used including upper and lower arches for each case. To verify the reliability of the scanner, we scanned the reference models 2 times before integrating the image into the 4 softwares. Each orthodontist made a check mark on each option in the checklist. A check mark with YES was given a One point, and a check mark with NO was given Zero point. The study depended on reviews from orthodontists depending on their clinical and practical experience with the tested softwares for analysis, planning and production of clear aligners for indicated cases. Case selection was discussed in the inclusion criteria in this study, as the cases were selected according to literature recommendations for aligner treatment, and in the same time to be simple cases that could be properly assessed and designed using studied orthodontic software. Results of this study revealed no statistically significant difference between the tested softwares regarding the first and second questions that were concerned with achieving the aims of the softwares and their reliability. The results of this study showed all the softwares are reliable in dental planning and designing for clear aligners, meanwhile differences existed between them in the arrangement of tools resulting in more complexity and consequently more time waste in their application. |
| 546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE |
|---|
| Language note |
Text in English, abstracts in English and Arabic |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Orthodontics |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Orthodontie Appareils amovibles |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Tooth Movement Techniques methods |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| Materials specified |
DSpace electronic resources |
| Uniform Resource Identifier |
<a href="http://repository.fue.edu.eg/xmlui/handle/123456789/5779">http://repository.fue.edu.eg/xmlui/handle/123456789/5779</a> |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Koha item type |
Thesis |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Dewey Decimal Classification |