Transforming violent conflict : radical disagreement, dialogue and survival / Oliver Ramsbotham.
Material type:
TextSeries: Routledge studies in peace and conflict resolutionCopyright date: London ; New York : Routledge, 2010Description: xiii, 271 pages : illustartions ; 24 cmContent type: - text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9780415552073 (hbk.)
- 0415552079 (hbk.)
- 9780415552080 (pbk.)
- 0415552087 (pbk.)
- 9780203859674 (ebk.)
- 0203859677 (ebk.)
- 306.44 22 R.O.T
- P40 .R36 2010
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
Main library A3 | 306.44 R.O.T (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 00012213 |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Book Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Figures and boxes; Preface; Prologue: Having the first word; Part I Radical disagreement and intractable conflict; 1 Radical disagreement and discourse analysis; 2 Radical disagreement and conflict analysis; 3 Radical disagreement and conflict resolution; Part II Radical disagreement and the transformation of violent conflict; 4 Methodology: Studying agonistic dialogue; 5 Phenomenology: Exploring agonistic dialogue; 6 Epistemology: Understanding agonistic dialogue; 7 Praxis: Managing agonistic dialogue 8 Re-entry: Feeding back into conflict settlement and conflict transformationPart III Radical disagreement and the future: Theoretical and practical implications; 9 Radical disagreement and human difference; 10 Radical disagreement and human survival; Epilogue: Having the last word; Glossary; References; Index.
his book investigates intractable conflicts and their main verbal manifestation - radical disagreement - and explores what can be done when conflict resolution fails.The book identifies agonistic dialogue - dialogue between enemies - as the key to linguistic intractability. It suggests how agonistic dialogue can best be studied, explored, understood and managed even in the most severe political conflicts when negotiation, mediation, problem solving, dialogue for mutual understanding, and discourse ethics are unsuccessful. This approach of viewing radical disagreement as the c.
There are no comments on this title.