000 05771ntm a2200349 i 4500
001 12102116
005 20231004094136.0
008 150118s2022 ua a f bm 000 0 eng |
040 _aEG-EULC
_cEG-EULC
_erda
041 0 _aeng
_bara
082 0 4 _a617.69
_bS.M.A
_222
100 1 _aShalaby, Mohamed Amir,
_eauthor
_934035
245 1 0 _aAssessment of the effect of two different digital fabrication techniques on marginal and internal fit of interim fixed dental prosthesis /
_cSubmitted by Mohamed Amir Shalaby, (B.D.S. University of Sharjah (2012); Supervision by Prof. Ahmed Naguib Mohamed, Professor, Fixed prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University in Egypt, Prof. Hisham Ibrahim Al Ansari, Professor, Fixed Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Dr. Mennatallah Mohie El Din Wahba, Lecturer, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Future University in Egypt
246 1 5 _aتقييم التلاؤم الهامشي والداخلي للجسور المؤقتة الطويلة والقصيرة المصنعة بتقنيتين مختلفتين
264 1 _c2022
300 _avi, 88 pages, 4 pages :
_bcolor illustrations;
_c22 cm
336 _2rdacontent
_atext
337 _2rdamedia
_aunmediated
338 _2rdacarrier
_avolume
500 _aSupervision of Prof. Ahmed Naguib Mohamed, Professor, Fixed prosthodontics Department – Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Future University in Egypt Prof. Hisham Ibrahim Al Ansari, Professor, Fixed Prosthodontic Department – Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Dr. Mennatallah Mohie El Din Wahba, Lecturer, Fixed Prosthodontics Department – Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Future University in Egypt
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.)-Future University in Egypt, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Department of Fixed prosthodontics Department, 2022.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 3 _aInterim restoration provides esthetics and function for a specific time until the permanent restoration is fabricated. It should maintain the biological, mechanical, and esthetic principles to protect the pulp from any irritation, to preserve the periodontal health, and to maintain occlusal compatibility. The interim materials fabricated with CAD/CAM technologies exhibit high mechanical properties, color stable, and allow better fit integrity by eliminating polymerization shrinkage. Nissin dental model with missing upper left first premolar and upper left first molar, and upper right central incisor, upper right canine, and upper right first molar was used. The model was scanned using laboratory scanner, and the scanned file was saved as pre-operative STL format. Following that, the abutments were prepared using the CNC milling machine to maintain ideal standardization of the preparations. Then the prepared abutments were scanned again using the laboratory scanner, and the scanned file was saved as post-operative STL format. After scanning, the design of the restorations were chosen from the software library and adapted to the pre-operative STL file in order to be fabricated using the additive and subtractive technologies. A total of 24 interim bridges fabricated by different CAD/CAM technologies were used in this current in vitro study. The specimens were divided into two groups according to the fabrication method and span length; Group1 (n=12), 6 short span bridges were fabricated by additive technology, and 6 short span bridges fabricated by subtractive technology. Group II (n=12) 6 long span bridges were fabricated by additive technology, and 6 long span bridges fabricated by subtractive technology. Finally the fabricated bridges were scanned using the laboratory scanner and superimposed on the post-operative STL file using the Geomagic software in order measure the marginal and internal fit along the mesio-distal and buccolingual directions. The results showed that the fabrication process of the additive technology of the internal fit of long span bridge had a statistically significant effect compared to subtractive technology. The additive technique showed better fit in the the bucco-lingual direction and mesio-distal direction, with values of 40.5 μm and 73.4 μm in the bucco-lingual direction compared to the subtractive technique, and 62.3 μm and 91 μm in the mesio-distal direction. Furthermore, the internal fit of the short span bridges fabricated with additive technology showed statistically significant difference only in the buccolignual direction, with values 39 μm compared to 54.4 μm in the subtractive technique. By contrast, the span length influenced the internal fit in the subtractive technique which has led to a statistical significant difference. Regarding the effect on fabrication method on the marginal fit in the long span bridges, there was no statistical difference between the two technologies. On the other hand, regarding the span length, there was statistically significant difference between the fabrication technologies, where the additive technology exhibited lower mean values in the marginal area. In the short span bridges, the mean marginal fit of the additive technology was 57.7 μm whereas in the short span of the subtractive technology was 35.1 μm, indicating a statistically significant difference.
546 _aText in English, abstracts in English and Arabic.
650 0 _aProsthodontics
650 0 _aBridges (Dentistry)
650 0 _aCrowns (Dentistry)
650 0 _aDentures
856 4 0 _3DSpace electronic resources
_uhttp://repository.fue.edu.eg/xmlui/handle/123456789/5779
942 _cTHESIS
_2ddc
999 _c13160
_d13160