| 000 | 03563ntm a2200325 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 12102116 | ||
| 005 | 20231203094047.0 | ||
| 008 | 150118s2023 ua a f bm 000 0 eng | | ||
| 040 |
_aEG-NcFUE _cEG-NcFUE _erda |
||
| 041 | 0 |
_aeng _bara |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a617.643 _bH.K.C _222 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aHammam, Karim Ibrahim El-Sayed _eauthor _934037 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aComparing program compatibility for dental operators between different in-office clear aligners softwares / _cKarim Ibrahim EL-Sayed Hammam (BDS 2014 MIU University), Supervisors Dr. Essam Mohamed Nassef Selim, Professor of orthodontics, Future University in Egypt, Dr. Mostafa Mohamed EL-Dawlatly, Associate professor of orthodontics, Cairo University |
| 246 | 1 | 5 | _aمقارنة توافق بين عدة برامج حاسوبية مختلفة للتقويم الشفاف في العيادات لاطباء الأسنان |
| 264 | 1 | _c2023 | |
| 300 |
_a72 pages, 2 pages : _bcolor illustrations; _c24 cm |
||
| 336 |
_2rdacontent _atext |
||
| 337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated |
||
| 338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume |
||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.)-Future University in Egypt, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics Department, 2023 | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references. | ||
| 520 | 3 | _aThe aim of the present study was to: Compare program compatibility for dental operators between different in office clear aligners softwares: (3D Maestro,3Shape, BlueSky bio, Plainmeca) Comparison and evaluation will be done by users using simple scoring templates after using the 4 softwares. Four different orthodontic planning softwares used for planning clear aligners cases were used in this study. After working on the fabrication process of the aligner on the software the clinician was given a scoring template for evaluation Ten orthodontists were recruited for the evaluation process A total of 48 casts were used including upper and lower arches for each case. To verify the reliability of the scanner, we scanned the reference models 2 times before integrating the image into the 4 softwares. Each orthodontist made a check mark on each option in the checklist. A check mark with YES was given a One point, and a check mark with NO was given Zero point. The study depended on reviews from orthodontists depending on their clinical and practical experience with the tested softwares for analysis, planning and production of clear aligners for indicated cases. Case selection was discussed in the inclusion criteria in this study, as the cases were selected according to literature recommendations for aligner treatment, and in the same time to be simple cases that could be properly assessed and designed using studied orthodontic software. Results of this study revealed no statistically significant difference between the tested softwares regarding the first and second questions that were concerned with achieving the aims of the softwares and their reliability. The results of this study showed all the softwares are reliable in dental planning and designing for clear aligners, meanwhile differences existed between them in the arrangement of tools resulting in more complexity and consequently more time waste in their application. | |
| 546 | _aText in English, abstracts in English and Arabic | ||
| 650 | 0 | _aOrthodontics | |
| 650 | 0 | _aOrthodontie Appareils amovibles | |
| 650 | 0 | _aTooth Movement Techniques methods | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_3DSpace electronic resources _uhttp://repository.fue.edu.eg/xmlui/handle/123456789/5779 |
| 942 |
_cTHESIS _2ddc |
||
| 999 |
_c13162 _d13162 |
||