MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
| fixed length control field |
04721nam a22003257i 4500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
| control field |
20240226122656.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
| fixed length control field |
240226s2023 ua|a|||| b||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
| Original cataloging agency |
EG-NcFUE |
| Description conventions |
rda |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title |
eng |
| Language code of original and/or intermediate translations of text |
ara |
| 082 04 - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER |
| Edition number |
22 |
| Classification number |
617.643 |
| Item number |
A.O.T |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
| Personal name |
Abouwafia, Omar Hazem Omar |
| Relator term |
author. |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
| Title |
Three-dimensional evaluation of teeth position using 0.018’’ versus 0.022’’ slot brackets in non-extraction orthodontic treatment: |
| Remainder of title |
a randomized clinical trial / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc |
Omar Hazem Omar Abouwafia, B.D.S. Alexandria University (2016); Supervisors, Prof. Dr. Hala Munir, (HM), BDS, MSC, Ph.D., FDS RCSEd, Professor of Orthodontics–Future University in Egypt, Prof. Dr. Mona Salah Fayed, BDS, MSc, PhD, DrMedDent, FDS RCSEd, Department of Orthodontics–Cairo University, Dr. Nouran F. Seifeldin, BDS, MSc, PhD, Lecturer-Department of Orthodontics. |
| 246 35 - VARYING FORM OF TITLE |
| Title proper/short title |
تقييم ثلاثي الأبعاد لوضع الأسنان باستخدام الحاصرات التقويمية ذوات فتحة 0.018 بوصة مقابل فتحة 0.022 بوصة في تقويم الأسنان بدون خلع: |
| Remainder of title |
تجربة سريرية عشوائية |
| 264 #0 - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc |
2023 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
| Extent |
iv, 111 pages: |
| Other physical details |
color illustrations; |
| Dimensions |
24 cm. |
| 336 ## - CONTENT TYPE |
| Source |
rdacontent |
| Content type term |
text |
| 337 ## - MEDIA TYPE |
| Source |
rdamedia |
| Media type term |
unmediated |
| 338 ## - CARRIER TYPE |
| Source |
rdacarrier |
| Carrier type term |
volume |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
| General note |
Supervisors, Prof. Dr. Hala Munir, (HM), BDS, MSC, Ph.D., FDS RCSEd, Professor of Orthodontics–Future University in Egypt, Prof. Dr. Mona Salah Fayed, BDS, MSc, PhD, DrMedDent, FDS RCSEd, Department of Orthodontics–Cairo University, Dr. Nouran F. Seifeldin, BDS, MSc, PhD, Lecturer-Department of Orthodontics. |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
| General note |
includes appendix (pages 89-111) |
| 502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE |
| Dissertation note |
Thesis (M.Sc.)--Future University in Egypt, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Orthodontics Department, 2023. |
| 504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE |
| Bibliography, etc |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 83-88) |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
| Summary, etc |
Since the development of the edgewise appliance and the advent of different alloys in fabricating archwires, orthodontists shifted between using 0.018 inch bracket slot and 0.022 inch bracket slot. Clinical studies that compared the quality of treatment between both bracket slot sizes are scarce making the clinicians’ choice based only on personal preferences. In this study, 0.018” and 0.022” slot sizes were compared in terms of three-dimensional evaluation of tooth position and duration of alignment stage. The tip and torque movements of upper and lower teeth were evaluated before and after alignment and leveling using CBCT images, while duration of alignment was assessed by recording the number of visits. Fourteen patients with mild to moderate crowding having normal skeletal and Angle Class I molar relation were included in the study. The sample was randomly and equally divided into 2 groups where Group 1 was treated with 0.018-inch bracket slot and Group 2 with 0.022-inch bracket slot. A standardized wire sequence was followed in each group where in Group 1 (0.018-inch) bracket slot the wire sequence was 0.014” and 0.016”, 0.016”×0.022” NiTi followed by 0.016”×0.022” and 0.017”×0.025” StSt and for Group 2 (0.022-inch) bracket slot it was 0.014” and 0.016”, 0.016”×0.022” NiTi, followed by 0.016”×0.022”, 0.017”×0.025” and 0.019×0.025 StSt. CBCT images were used to assess pre and post- alignment tip and torque movements accurately and were compared between both groups. CBCT images were taken prior to bonding brackets and one month after reaching the final wire. The investigator assigned for measuring the obtained CBCT images was blinded. Number of visits were recorded for both groups till the end of the alignment phase reaching the last wire. The results obtained from the current study showed: 1. Insignificant difference in the crown inclination and angulation of maxillary and mandibular teeth was found between both groups. 2. A statistically significant shorter duration of alignment was found for Group 1 (.018”) compared to Group 2 (0.022”) slot however, this difference may be clinically insignificant. Within the limitations of the current study, the following can be concluded: 1. None of the bracket slot sizes attained superior results over the other when it came to tip and torque movements in both maxillary and mandibular arches. 2. 0.018 inch bracket slots might have a slightly shorter duration of alignment compared to 0.022” slot brackets. |
| 546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE |
| Language note |
Text in English, Abstract in English, and Arabic. |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Orthodontics |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Orthodontics methods |
| 650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Orthodontics, Corrective |
| 856 0# - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
| Uniform Resource Identifier |
http://repository.fue.edu.eg/handle/123456789/6310 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
| Item type |
Thesis |