Comparing program compatibility for dental operators between different in-office clear aligners softwares / Karim Ibrahim EL-Sayed Hammam (BDS 2014 MIU University), Supervisors Dr. Essam Mohamed Nassef Selim, Professor of orthodontics, Future University in Egypt, Dr. Mostafa Mohamed EL-Dawlatly, Associate professor of orthodontics, Cairo University

By:

Hammam, Karim Ibrahim El-Sayed [author]

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: English Summary language: Arabic Publisher: 2023Description: 72 pages, 2 pages : color illustrations; 24 cmContent type:

text

Media type:

unmediated

Carrier type:

volume

Other title:

مقارنة توافق بين عدة برامج حاسوبية مختلفة للتقويم الشفاف في العيادات لاطباء الأسنان [Added title page title]

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

617.643 H.K.C 22

Online resources:

DSpace electronic resources

Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Sc.)-Future University in Egypt, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics Department, 2023 Abstract: The aim of the present study was to: Compare program compatibility for dental operators between different in office clear aligners softwares: (3D Maestro,3Shape, BlueSky bio, Plainmeca) Comparison and evaluation will be done by users using simple scoring templates after using the 4 softwares. Four different orthodontic planning softwares used for planning clear aligners cases were used in this study. After working on the fabrication process of the aligner on the software the clinician was given a scoring template for evaluation Ten orthodontists were recruited for the evaluation process A total of 48 casts were used including upper and lower arches for each case. To verify the reliability of the scanner, we scanned the reference models 2 times before integrating the image into the 4 softwares. Each orthodontist made a check mark on each option in the checklist. A check mark with YES was given a One point, and a check mark with NO was given Zero point. The study depended on reviews from orthodontists depending on their clinical and practical experience with the tested softwares for analysis, planning and production of clear aligners for indicated cases. Case selection was discussed in the inclusion criteria in this study, as the cases were selected according to literature recommendations for aligner treatment, and in the same time to be simple cases that could be properly assessed and designed using studied orthodontic software. Results of this study revealed no statistically significant difference between the tested softwares regarding the first and second questions that were concerned with achieving the aims of the softwares and their reliability. The results of this study showed all the softwares are reliable in dental planning and designing for clear aligners, meanwhile differences existed between them in the arrangement of tools resulting in more complexity and consequently more time waste in their application.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Thesis	Main library C3 THESIES	Dental ( Orthodontics & Pedodontics )	H.K.C 617.643 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Not for loan		00017356

Browsing Main library shelves, Shelving location: C3 THESIES Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available
Previous	617.692 A.W.E The effect of setting up of teeth within the neutral zone on phonation /	617.692 E.A.E Effect of scan body design on the accuracy of the implant position in implant supported prosthesis /	617.692 M.W.S Strength and microstructure of some metal-free restoration using three different construction techniques /	H.K.C 617.643 Comparing program compatibility for dental operators between different in-office clear aligners softwares /

Thesis (M.Sc.)-Future University in Egypt, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics Department, 2023

Includes bibliographical references.

The aim of the present study was to: Compare program compatibility for dental operators between different in office clear aligners softwares: (3D Maestro,3Shape, BlueSky bio, Plainmeca) Comparison and evaluation will be done by users using simple scoring templates after using the 4 softwares. Four different orthodontic planning softwares used for planning clear aligners cases were used in this study. After working on the fabrication process of the aligner on the software the clinician was given a scoring template for evaluation Ten orthodontists were recruited for the evaluation process A total of 48 casts were used including upper and lower arches for each case. To verify the reliability of the scanner, we scanned the reference models 2 times before integrating the image into the 4 softwares. Each orthodontist made a check mark on each option in the checklist. A check mark with YES was given a One point, and a check mark with NO was given Zero point. The study depended on reviews from orthodontists depending on their clinical and practical experience with the tested softwares for analysis, planning and production of clear aligners for indicated cases. Case selection was discussed in the inclusion criteria in this study, as the cases were selected according to literature recommendations for aligner treatment, and in the same time to be simple cases that could be properly assessed and designed using studied orthodontic software. Results of this study revealed no statistically significant difference between the tested softwares regarding the first and second questions that were concerned with achieving the aims of the softwares and their reliability. The results of this study showed all the softwares are reliable in dental planning and designing for clear aligners, meanwhile differences existed between them in the arrangement of tools resulting in more complexity and consequently more time waste in their application.

Text in English, abstracts in English and Arabic

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.